A bitter High Court dispute has damaged out between future neighbours in excess of the development of a wall at a coastal web site inside of a north Dublin suburb, a case which has captivated countrywide interest pursuing an Irish Situations report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres on a proposed relatives home at Sutton Strand, in which allegations of setting up breaches, environmental concerns, and lengthy-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled to the courts. The Irish Periods posting about René Collier and also the Irish Instances report about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what started as a neighborhood disagreement has advanced into a very publicised authorized battle.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing above building operates at the positioning on Dublin Street, Sutton, in which Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a doctor and an organization director respectively, look for to build their family members home. The situation happens to be emblematic of broader disputes along Eire’s coastline, wherever growth pressures collide with environmental protections along with the sensitivities of proven residents. In accordance with the Irish Periods report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall staying made by their prospective neighbours goes further than the boundaries permitted underneath preparing authorization.
René Collier and Paul Feely, equally residents of Dublin Street, claim that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the phrases of their planning authorization by creating a wall over and above the boundaries in their web site, bringing about an encroachment on the Distinctive Spot of Conservation. The SAC designation is central towards the dispute, as a result locations are subject matter to strict controls underneath European and Irish environmental regulation. Within their courtroom filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even minor encroachments could have Long lasting ecological consequences, notably in a sensitive coastal natural environment like Sutton Strand.
Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny These are in breach in their preparing permission, and say the wall, and that is partly built, is in the correct placement. Their authorized staff has characterised the motion being an make an effort to hold off or frustrate a lawful development. The couple accuse litigants of searching for to halt homebuilding so that you can maintain their view, an allegation that has been repeated in court and referenced in protection of the situation. This accusation goes to the guts of numerous coastal setting up disputes, wherever sights of The ocean are equally remarkably prized and hotly contested.
The Irish Periods report naming René Collier and Paul Feely explained extraordinary endeavours via the plaintiffs to doc the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded by ocean in storm to photograph the location, As outlined by sworn proof referenced while in the Irish Instances. In one account, Rene Collier waded through midsection-significant drinking water in the course of a storm to photograph the website Irish Times, a picture which has given that turn out to be emblematic of the depth on the dispute. These actions were not merely symbolic; they were being intended to gather Visible evidence with the wall’s placement relative to tidal lines and protected land.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the website within the sea Irish Moments reported, describing how The 2 Males entered the h2o in the course of serious climatic conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading by means of storm h2o to photograph the website grew to become Just about the most placing descriptions to arise from court reporting. The Irish Moments article about accountant Paul Feely observed that this kind of actions ended up cited to show the plaintiffs’ belief the wall prolonged into an area impacted by tidal motion, strengthening their argument which the SAC was remaining encroached upon.
The functions at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 were lined intimately by the national press. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Periods 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Occasions January 27 2026 became broadly searched phrases as audience sought to understand the track record and implications of the case. On that date, the High Court heard more submissions on whether interim orders needs to be granted to halt building pending a complete hearing. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a critical minute from the lawful timeline.
Within the core of the dispute is actually a disagreement about boundaries, scheduling compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely maintain that the wall, as constructed, goes beyond what was authorized and intrudes into guarded land. They argue that this is not a trivial technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by profession, has been called meticulous in his evaluation of arranging documents, maps, and circumstances hooked up for the permission.
Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have both of those stressed that their motion is enthusiastic by worry for environmental safety and adherence to planning regulation. They reject statements that the situation is about preserving A non-public see, insisting rather that it is about guaranteeing that advancement at Sutton Strand respects lawful and ecological boundaries. In affidavits, they've explained their extended-standing relationship to the area as well as their awareness of its environmental sensitivity.
On the opposite facet, Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela have portrayed on their own as a pair merely trying to make a family members household in accordance With all the regulation. They deny that the wall encroaches on the Specific Region of Conservation and say that each one will work happen to be completed based on Skilled information and authorized strategies. Their legal professionals have argued which the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and that the remarkable actions of René Collier and Paul Feely, which include entering the sea in the course of a storm, will not alter the fundamental points.
The situation has also lifted broader questions on how planning disputes are resolved in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter court dispute more than construction of wall at coastal web site happens to be a shorthand description to get a scenario that a lot of observers see as more and more widespread. As sea stages increase and coastal erosion intensifies, the exact delineation involving personal land, public foreshore, and guarded habitats has become additional contentious.
The Irish Moments report about René Collier pointed out which the businessman experienced Beforehand been linked to local advocacy on organizing and environmental concerns, however not at this scale. Meanwhile, the Irish Instances write-up about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how men and women from quite diverse Specialist backgrounds can find on their own aligned in this kind of disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some reviews spell their names, have grown to be synonymous With all the Sutton Strand case.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the site within the sea Irish Situations coverage emphasised, underlining the unusual lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded as a result of waistline-higher drinking water Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 throughout a storm to photograph the location Irish Times and René Collier waded by way of midsection-higher drinking water all through a storm to photograph the site Irish Instances are phrases that appeared consistently in protection, reflecting each the Bodily actuality with the coastline and the symbolic nature in the act. For supporters on the plaintiffs, these steps shown motivation; for critics, they illustrated the things they see being an abnormal tactic.
Given that the High Court proceedings continue, the outcome continues to be unsure. The court docket ought to identify whether or not the wall as built complies with planning authorization and whether or not any encroachment into a Special Area of Conservation has happened. The lawful arguments are intricate, involving interpretation of maps, tidal facts, and arranging situations. However the human element continues to be central: neighbours who ought to Dwell alongside one another very long following the legal expenditures are paid out.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing more than design performs at the website on Dublin Highway, Sutton, although the implications of the case prolong past that handle. For planners, developers, and people alike, the dispute serves being a reminder of the importance of clarity in setting up permissions and sensitivity in coastal advancement. It also underscores how promptly a local disagreement can escalate when essential problems which include environmental safety and assets rights are perceived being at stake.
Meanwhile, Sutton Strand remains an area of natural splendor and contested boundaries. The wall at the centre in the dispute stands partly crafted, a physical manifestation of unresolved authorized issues. Whether or not it can ultimately be altered, eliminated, or accomplished as prepared will rely upon the court docket’s conclusions. Till then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their variations will probably continue on to look in headlines, connected indelibly to One of the more intently viewed scheduling disputes in north Dublin in recent years.