A bitter High Court dispute has broken out among future neighbours in excess of the development of a wall at a coastal internet site inside of a north Dublin suburb, a situation which has captivated countrywide interest adhering to an Irish Situations report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres on a proposed relatives dwelling at Sutton Strand, exactly where allegations of setting up breaches, environmental fears, and lengthy-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled in to the courts. The Irish Moments short article about René Collier as well as Irish Times post about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what started as a neighborhood disagreement has developed into a very publicised legal battle.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing more than construction functions at the website on Dublin Road, Sutton, exactly where Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a doctor and a corporation director respectively, request to make their spouse and children household. The case is now emblematic of wider disputes together Ireland’s coastline, exactly where development pressures collide with environmental protections and the sensitivities of recognized citizens. According to the Irish Situations report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall staying created by their prospective neighbours goes further than the boundaries permitted beneath preparing authorization.
René Collier and Paul Feely, the two people of Dublin Street, assert that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the terms in their scheduling authorization by creating a wall over and above the boundaries of their website, bringing about an encroachment with a Exclusive Place of Conservation. The SAC designation is central to your dispute, as a result locations are subject to demanding controls underneath European and Irish environmental legislation. In their court docket filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even slight encroachments could have Long lasting ecological effects, especially in a delicate coastal atmosphere for example Sutton Strand.
Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny they are in breach of their organizing authorization, and say the wall, which happens to be partially developed, is in the right situation. Their lawful team has characterised the action as an attempt to delay or frustrate a lawful advancement. The few accuse litigants of trying to find to halt homebuilding in order to preserve their see, an allegation that has been repeated in court and referenced in coverage of the situation. This accusation goes to the guts of numerous coastal scheduling disputes, where by sights of The ocean are both equally remarkably prized and hotly contested.
The Irish Situations report naming René Collier and Paul Feely described extraordinary endeavours because of the plaintiffs to doc the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded by way of ocean in storm to photograph the location, As outlined by sworn proof referenced inside the Irish Instances. In one account, Rene Collier waded as a result of midsection-substantial water throughout a storm to photograph the site Irish Situations, a picture that has since come to be emblematic on the intensity of your dispute. These actions weren't simply symbolic; they were meant to Collect Visible evidence with the wall’s placement relative to tidal strains and protected land.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the site with the sea Irish Occasions claimed, describing how the two Adult men entered the water all through extreme climatic conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading via storm drinking water to photograph the site grew to become one of the most hanging descriptions to arise from court docket reporting. The Irish Instances posting about accountant Paul Feely mentioned that these steps had been cited to exhibit the plaintiffs’ perception which the wall prolonged into an area impacted by tidal movement, strengthening their argument the SAC was remaining encroached upon.
The occasions at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 have been protected intimately by the national press. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Instances 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Moments January 27 2026 grew to become commonly searched phrases as audience sought to understand the background and implications of the case. On that day, the High Court read further submissions on no matter whether interim orders really should be granted to halt development pending a complete hearing. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a essential second inside the legal timeline.
In the core of the dispute is a disagreement over boundaries, planning compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely maintain which the wall, as produced, goes outside of what was accredited and intrudes into safeguarded land. They argue that this isn't a trivial technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by profession, has long been referred to as meticulous in his examination of planning files, maps, and situations attached to your permission.
Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have both pressured that their action is determined by problem for environmental security and adherence to arranging law. They reject statements that the case is about preserving A non-public see, insisting in its place that it is about making sure that growth at Sutton Strand respects lawful and ecological limitations. In affidavits, they have described their extensive-standing connection to the world as well as their awareness of its environmental sensitivity.
On the other side, Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela have portrayed on their own as a few merely seeking to create a relatives house in accordance Along with the law. They deny that the wall encroaches on the Exclusive Region of Conservation and say that each one will work have been carried out determined by Experienced guidance and accredited options. Their legal professionals have argued which the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and which the extraordinary steps of René Collier and Paul Feely, including entering the sea in the course of a storm, tend not to change the underlying information.
The case has also raised broader questions about how preparing disputes are resolved in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter court dispute over construction of wall at coastal site has become a shorthand description for a situation that many observers see as increasingly common. As sea levels increase and coastal erosion intensifies, the exact delineation among private land, general public foreshore, and guarded habitats has started to become much more contentious.
The Irish Times posting about René Collier observed the businessman experienced Earlier been associated with local advocacy on scheduling and environmental difficulties, even though not at this scale. In the meantime, the Irish Moments write-up about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how individuals from incredibly distinct Expert backgrounds can discover themselves aligned in these disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some reviews spell their names, are getting to be synonymous Together with the Sutton Strand case.
Paul Feely and René René Collier and Paul Feely Collier photographed the location in the sea Irish Periods coverage emphasised, underlining the unusual lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded as a result of waist-substantial h2o in the course of a storm to photograph the internet site Irish Occasions and René Collier waded by midsection-large drinking water during a storm to photograph the website Irish Periods are phrases that appeared repeatedly in coverage, reflecting the two the Bodily fact of your coastline as well as the symbolic character with the act. For supporters of your plaintiffs, these steps shown determination; for critics, they illustrated what they see being an too much approach.
Because the High Court proceedings proceed, the outcome remains uncertain. The court should figure out whether the wall as constructed complies with organizing permission and whether or not any encroachment into a Special Area of Conservation has happened. The authorized arguments are intricate, involving interpretation of maps, tidal information, and organizing situations. However the human factor continues to be central: neighbours who have to Stay together with one another long once the authorized fees have already been paid.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing around development functions at the site on Dublin Street, Sutton, nevertheless the implications of the situation lengthen beyond that handle. For planners, developers, and residents alike, the dispute serves to be a reminder of the value of clarity in preparing permissions and sensitivity in coastal enhancement. What's more, it underscores how swiftly an area disagreement can escalate when fundamental difficulties including environmental defense and property rights are perceived to generally be at stake.
In the meantime, Sutton Strand stays an area of all-natural magnificence and contested boundaries. The wall at the centre on the dispute stands partly built, a Bodily manifestation of unresolved authorized thoughts. Regardless of whether it will eventually ultimately be altered, taken out, or concluded as prepared will count on the court’s findings. Until finally then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their versions will probable continue to look in headlines, linked indelibly to Probably the most carefully watched organizing disputes in north Dublin in recent times.